Despre blogging și ascensiunea rețelelor sociale

Câteva extrase dintr-un articol destul de lung despre cum s-a schimbat internetul în ultimii 15 ani, cum au evoluat blogurile, ascensiunea rețelelor sociale și felul în care ne informăm acum online, cum am ajuns să fim dependenți de recomandările prietenilor de pe Facebook și de schimbările făcute în algoritmii aplicațiilor. The Web We Have to Save.

Blogs were gold and bloggers were rock stars back in 2008 when I was arrested. At that point, and despite the fact the state was blocking access to my blog from inside Iran, I had an audience of around 20,000 people every day. Everybody I linked to would face a sudden and serious jump in traffic: I could empower or embarrass anyone I wanted.

The iPhone was a little over a year old by then, but smartphones were still mostly used to make phone calls and send short messages, handle emails, and surf the web. There were no real apps, certainly not how we think of them today. There was no Instagram, no SnapChat, no Viber, no WhatsApp.

Blogs gave form to that spirit of decentralization: They were windows into lives you’d rarely know much about; bridges that connected different lives to each other and thereby changed them. Blogs were cafes where people exchanged diverse ideas on any and every topic you could possibly be interested in.

Nearly every social network now treats a link as just the same as it treats any other object — the same as a photo, or a piece of text — instead of seeing it as a way to make that text richer. You’re encouraged to post one single hyperlink and expose it to a quasi-democratic process of liking and plussing and hearting: Adding several links to a piece of text is usually not allowed. Hyperlinks are objectivized, isolated, stripped of their powers.

At the same time, these social networks tend to treat native text and pictures — things that are directly posted to them — with a lot more respect than those that reside on outside web pages. One photographer friend explained to me how the images he uploads directly to Facebook receive a large number of likes, which in turn means they appear more on other people’s news feeds. On the other hand, when he posts a link to the same picture somewhere outside Facebook — his now-dusty blog, for instance — the images are much less visible to Facebook itself, and therefore get far fewer likes. The cycle reinforces itself.

Some networks, like Twitter, treat hyperlinks a little better. Others, insecure social services, are far more paranoid. Instagram — owned by Facebook — doesn’t allow its audiences to leave whatsoever. You can put up a web address alongside your photos, but it won’t go anywhere. Lots of people start their daily online routine in these cul de sacs of social media, and their journeys end there. Many don’t even realize that they’re using the Internet’s infrastructure when they like an Instagram photograph or leave a comment on a friend’s Facebook video. It’s just an app.

But hyperlinks aren’t just the skeleton of the web: They are its eyes, a path to its soul. And a blind webpage, one without hyperlinks, can’t look or gaze at another webpage — and this has serious consequences for the dynamics of power on the web.

More or less, all theorists have thought of gaze in relation to power, and mostly in a negative sense: the gazer strips the gazed and turns her into a powerless object, devoid of intelligence or agency. But in the world of webpages, gaze functions differently: It is more empowering. When a powerful website — say Google or Facebook — gazes at, or links to, another webpage, it doesn’t just connect it — it brings it into existence; gives it life. Metaphorically, without this empowering gaze, your web page doesn’t breathe. No matter how many links you have placed in a webpage, unless somebody is looking at it, it is actually both dead and blind; and therefore incapable of transferring power to any outside web page.

On the other hand, the most powerful web pages are those that have many eyes upon them. Just like celebrities who draw a kind of power from the millions of human eyes gazing at them any given time, web pages can capture and distribute their power through hyperlinks.

But apps like Instagram are blind — or almost blind. Their gaze goes nowhere except inwards, reluctant to transfer any of their vast powers to others, leading them into quiet deaths. The consequence is that web pages outside social media are dying.

The Stream now dominates the way people receive information on the web. Fewer users are directly checking dedicated webpages, instead getting fed by a never-ending flow of information that’s picked for them by complex –and secretive — algorithms.

The Stream means you don’t need to open so many websites any more. You don’t need numerous tabs. You don’t even need a web browser. You open Twitter or Facebook on your smartphone and dive deep in. The mountain has come to you. Algorithms have picked everything for you. According to what you or your friends have read or seen before, they predict what you might like to see. It feels great not to waste time in finding interesting things on so many websites.

But are we missing something here? What are we exchanging for efficiency?

Recomandă prietenilor!
7 Comentarii
Primele Top voturi
Inline Feedbacks
Vezi toate comentariile

Foarte buna remarca, aici ma regasesc eu ca cititor: “Blogs were cafes where people exchanged diverse ideas on any and every topic you could possibly be interested in.”

Cred ca (mai) multi cititori ar avea opinii interesante de spus, dar ceva ii retine de la a face comentarii. Poate lipsa timpului? A inspiratiei pt un comentariu care sa se ridice la nivelul articolului?

Cat despre ce imi serveste “algoritmul”, prefer sa-l by-pass-ez prin abonarea la RSS sau newsletter; asa am macar senzatia ca eu decid ce vreau sa citesc 🙂


Stiu. Totusi, lumea a devenit mult prea comoda – vezi cate comentarii se aduna la articolele despre concursuri fata de articolele care ar trebui sa incite la discutii.

Articolul tau imi aminteste de cei care merg pe la diverse cursuri (organizate de angajator, de obicei) si, intrebati fiind cum a fost cursul, exclama entuziasmati: “Foarte fain!” “Despre ce s-a discutat?” “A, despre mai multe, nu mai retin exact” … amnezie pe care o au si ulterior 🙂


Stii ceva despre faptul ca facebook cere acte de identificare?  daca nu le trimiti iti blocheaza contul… ce e asta???? E corect, e normal, e legal??? Evident ca nu vreau sa trimit actele de identitate eter…mai bine imi inchid contul de fb, desi ma ajuta mult in business. Ce parere ai? Ai mai auzit si la altii? Cum ne putem lupta cu acest abuz?

[…] e supărată, mă întreabă într-un comentariu ce se poate face pentru a lupta impotriva abuzurilor făcute de Facebook, care au avut tupeul să […]


Imi place